Thirst for Knowledge

         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         

         





        Thirst for Knowledge:

        Associations, Information and Professional Development

        Richard Hurd

        Continuing education is at the core of the mission and operation of professional associations. In this document, Professor Richard Hurd looks at the many forms the education takes, ranging from publications and conferences to formal partnerships with degree granting institutions. He sets the context by briefly describing the broader role of associations and then details the program delivery and the challenges related to quality assurance.


        Executive Summary
        • Associations provide opportunities for members to advance knowledge, access information, and network with peers.

        • Associations recognize that the more they do to enhance specialization within the profession, the stronger hold they have on members.

        • The extent and type of continuing education offered by professional associations are determined by member interest, licensing requirements, and formal procedures for re-certification.

        • Association professional development programs are expected to accomplish conflicting objectives: (1) they must offer ready access at low cost so members can meet credentialing needs with minimum effort, and (2) they are expected to challenge members with complex information and critical analysis in order to advance the field.

        • The most realistic and effective applications of technology recognize limitations inherent in distance education formats and use them to offer broad access to information without attempting to achieve in-depth or transformational learning.

        • Associations can greatly extend their educational reach by co-sponsoring or endorsing programs delivered by other organizations.

        • The most troublesome challenges with endorsements or licensing arrangements are maintaining influence over content and monitoring the quality of the educational experience.

        • Associations that license educational providers have not been able to enforce quality standards; the only check comes from members who reward success by enrolling in future courses and punish failure by withholding enrollment.

        • The best professional development opportunities offered directly by associations incorporate advance checks on content, systems to promote effective adult education pedagogy, and careful assessment of results.

        • The implicit goals of most association professional development programs are effective communication and customer satisfaction.

        • Sophisticated evaluation and assessment are rare; if the event was profitable, attendance was good, and participants were satisfied there is an assumption that higher educational objectives were achieved.

        • Carefully designed intensive residence learning events can create an environment where participants examine how they think and embrace enduring change.

        • Some associations sponsor opportunities for employers to engage in needs driven strategic planning for the profession.

        • Some associations engage in strategic planning on behalf of the profession then attempt to influence practice and promote transformation.



          Introduction

          Continuing education is at the core of the mission and operation of professional associations. The education takes many forms, ranging from publications and conferences to formal partnerships with degree granting institutions. Before turning to some of the details of program delivery and the challenges related to quality assurance, it is important to set the context by briefly describing the broader role of associations.

          Professions achieve their standing not solely because of inherent qualities of the work, but also as a product of intentional collective effort among practitioners to elevate the status of the occupation. Professional associations are essential to this process. In the early stages of professionalization a new association typically adopts a strong code of ethics that spells out the expectations of professional behavior and emphasizes service to the public. The codes of associations of medical professionals, for example, often refer to patient rights and quality health care, while associations of engineers identify structural safety as a priority. Based in part on its code of ethics, the association strives to promote a dignified public image for the profession. This is reinforced by establishing certification standards (either generally for the profession or for areas of specialty practice) and through political action designed to influence state licensure requirements. Ultimately most associations address scope of practice, attempting to delineate the expertise and competence of their members from those of related occupations. For example, the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) is concerned about distinguishing the role of its members from the functions of nurse practitioners. Similarly, the New York State Psychological Association (NYSPA) is interested in differentiating the scope of practice of psychologists from that of social workers and all purpose "therapists."

          In addition to defining and promoting the profession, associations provide mechanisms for members to advance knowledge, disseminate information, and network with their peers. Education is central to virtually every aspect of professional association life: educational requirements help elevate and demarcate the profession, and continuing education reinforces knowledge while simultaneously contributing to the mystique of specialized expertise which is essential for the continuation of professional status.

          Professional associations are voluntary membership organizations governed by democratic procedures. They rely heavily on members to handle many organizational functions as unpaid volunteers; even national officers seldom receive any compensation beyond travel expenses. This network of volunteer leaders coordinates closely with a parallel set of paid staff typically hired from outside the profession to handle specialized functions such as political action, public relations, publications, education, member services, and finance.

          Although the focus here is on the role of national associations, it is important to recognize that most have a strong network of quasi-independent state affiliates, local chapters and special interest sections. At all levels, associations maintain cordial relations and often close collaboration with key employers. The American Institute of Architects (AIA), for example, has about 65,000 members and 300 chapters, and works closely with over 350 large architectural firms. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has a decentralized structure, maintaining a loose knit network of independent state associations and local chapters. Each affiliate has its own self-determined dues and governance system, although membership overlap across levels is about 80 percent. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is even more loose knit serving as an umbrella association for 36 societies and four technical councils along with 300 local organizations (many affiliated directly with one of the technical societies) and 1000 student branches. Peter Wiesner, Director of Continuing Education, acknowledges that "IEEE is a large complex organization that decentralizes programs and attendant decision making."

          In virtually all professional associations special interest sections serve as an essential point of contact for members. It is here that the particularities of their interests, expertise and professional job responsibilities are addressed. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has 100,000 members including speech-language pathologists employed in schools (44%), other speech-language pathologists (36%), audiologists (14%), and speech and hearing scientists (6%). ASHA designs publications, educational programs and conferences with specific input from each of these groups. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has 500 different technical committees, many of whom regularly sponsor research publications. The ties of these special interest groups to an association's educational efforts are direct. The AIA's 21 professional practice areas sponsor about 50 educational conferences each year. The AAPA's 19 specialty organizations help plan conference tracks. Greg Thomas, AAPA Vice President for Clinical Affairs and Education, believes that this effort is "key to retaining specialist PAs as members."

          Because professional associations operate as voluntary organizations, membership retention is crucial for survival. As a result, all aspects of association life are influenced by the interests and desires of members, and great attention is paid to member priorities. Although priorities differ from one profession to another, access to various forms of information is consistently important. Only about ten percent of ASCE members are active in chapters or on technical committees, but all apparently appreciate the extensive range of technical publications available to members. The American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) recently surveyed members regarding their priorities with these results: 1. networking, 2. publications, 3. career services (especially important because of reduced job security for engineers in our restructured economy). Edd Farrell, membership director for AAPA, reports that members belong in order to qualify for the association's malpractice insurance, to network, and to gain access to two educational benefits: an annual conference that offers 350 sessions approved for continuing education credit, and a credit logging and reporting service that helps members fulfill state licensing requirements.

          Practitioners, then, belong to professional associations for both collective and individual reasons. They support their association's efforts to promote the profession with the public and through political action. They appreciate opportunities to socialize and engage in substantive discussions with other members of the occupation who have similar training and interests. In essence, association membership satisfies an implicit desire for solidarity with peers. At the same time, these professionals want access to specialized benefits, and often to labor market and career services. Similarly, members are attracted to events and publications that enhance their own knowledge and earning power by offering access to certification and state of the art information.

          Associations have come to recognize that the more they do to enhance specialization within the profession, the stronger hold they have on members because they are simultaneously meeting collective and individual objectives. Associations effectively serve their members' needs by providing networking opportunities, specialized education, and targeted publications. The discussion will now turn to a more detailed look at key aspects of associations' continuing education initiatives.


          Licensing, Certification and the Demand for Professional Development

          As already noted, a prime motivator for professionals to join associations is the desire to enhance their own knowledge, particularly related to recent developments in the field. Within this broad context there are important nuances influenced directly by variations in licensing and certification requirements across professions and from state to state. Initial entry into a profession typically is tied at least informally to holding a relevant college degree; this expectation may in fact be a formal a prerequisite for full membership in the relevant association. In addition, successful performance on a licensing exam may be required in order to qualify for the legal right to practice. In some occupations, states establish additional formal requirements that must be met in order to retain licensure. Although national standards for a profession are not unusual, licensing and certification requirements normally are the province of state governments and there may be substantial variation.

          In those professions and states where licensing and certification are optional, the practitioners' desire for information is often satisfied by technical publications and annual conferences. In those jurisdictions with licensing exams and particularly where there are on-going certification requirements, professional development takes on an elevated level of importance. The extent and type of continuing education offered by professional associations are largely determined by these intertwined factors of member interest, requirements for entry into practice, and formal procedures for re-licensure and re-certification. Association educational initiatives are further influenced by competing organizations including university based extension programs, private vendors that offer targeted training, and employer sponsored in-house professional development.

          Professional associations may play a variety of roles that directly or indirectly influence the level of demand for their own continuing education programs. They often initiate efforts to promote licensing and certification. They are sometimes involved in accrediting university programs that offer relevant professional degrees. They may participate in the preparation of licensing examinations. They also may offer specialized credentials for members of the profession with experience and advanced training in a sub-field. Some associations actively support legislative initiatives that establish requirements for license renewal, often including regular accumulation of continuing education credits. Even when pressure to impose new standards comes from outside of the profession, associations attempt to influence the form they will take. In those professions where state regulations include continuing education expectations, associations often set up accrediting procedures for providers including universities, vendors and employers.

          A few examples will reflect the range of practice among professional associations. ASHA operates in an environment with licensing in 48 states, and almost all of its members face requirements to complete continuing education credits each year in order to retain certification; although speech-language pathologists employed in schools are not necessarily licensed, they must meet similar continuing education expectations. The association has assumed a central role in this process, establishing standards for Continuing Education Units (CEUs), accrediting providers, and in effect offering a registrar's service for members by tracking credits delivered by accredited providers. All of this involves working closely with state licensing agencies and regulatory boards, all of whom accept ASHA reported CEUs. The organization also delivers its own programs which offer members a range of opportunities to earn CEUs, including conferences, self study and various forms of distance learning.

          In 1995 the AIA adopted a new requirement for all members to complete 18 hours of continuing education each year in order to retain membership. Since then the number of states imposing similar standards on architects in order to preserve licensure has grown from three to twenty. The AIA now offers members a registrar's service similar to ASHA's, but has not expanded its own professional development programming, largely limited to an annual conference.

          In contrast to ASHA and AIA, the IEEE operates in an environment where licensing is optional for many of its members. Outside of the U.S., IEEE members may be licensed through their national society or government. In the U.S. about 15 percent of members have Professional Engineers licenses. The priority activities of the association revolve around publications, conferences, and standards development. According to Director of Continuing Education Peter Wiesner, "Membership in the IEEE demonstrates to industry, its regulatory bodies and to customers, strong support… for the development of standards, operating procedures and guidelines that … foster quality design and manufacture [and] safeguard against hazards." Although the IEEE and its affiliated societies offer literally hundreds of conferences each year, it is not the accumulation of continuing education credits that motivates most electrical engineers to attend. In this collection of professions the concept of lifelong education has taken hold, but it is graduate schools that serve as the chief means to add credentials. The IEEE's own direct professional development offerings are modest with this function decentralized and handled largely by the technical societies and sections.

          Other associations operating in labor markets without explicit continuing education requirements sometimes place higher priority on professional development programs than the IEEE. This is especially likely if the culture of the profession values continuing formal education, if such education is not easily accessible from universities, and if the organization's mission emphasizes this role. The Special Libraries Association (SLA), for example, was founded early in the twentieth century to help librarians deal with the print explosion. Because of the changing nature of librarianship inherent in that era, the importance of learning was explicitly recognized by the association's founders. One hundred years later, SLA is again responding to a dramatic environmental shift because of the revolution in information technology, and professional development is once again a top priority.

          Special librarians are generally expected to hold a graduate degree in library science, but there is no formal licensing and there are no continuing education requirements. For this profession, accumulating continuing education credits is irrelevant while access to the most recent information is essential, and opportunities to engage collectively in analysis of the implications of rapid change are valued highly. In this context, Managing Director of Professional Development Jeff De Cagna recognizes that "in some associations CEUs are important because the culture dictates…" since members have to accumulate credits to continue in practice. But he goes onto decry this situation because it "encourages the wrong way of thinking about learning." The SLA's ideal is a three to five day residence learning experience where participants are encouraged to probe more deeply and expand their horizons.

          Those responsible for professional development in associations that operate in the more regulated environments share De Cagna's concerns. Karen Niles of ASHA notes that "the continuing education requirement is nice because it creates an engine of demand, but there are some negatives because they only want the credits." Similarly, Thom Lowther of AIA concedes: "We're not good enough yet. Two-thirds of our members want top notch programs… [but] most think that we are just keeping numbers."

          Members of professional associations want access to information; they are drawn to professional development programs that address the most current issues in the field, particularly when the instructor is a proven presenter or a star in the discipline. Members also want their narrow interests addressed, and particularly like continuing education offerings in their area of specialization. All of this would seem to point towards high quality, in-depth professional development. But, members also want easy access, and where there are explicit certification requirements they want easy credits. By in large they support association initiatives that restrict entry into the profession and preserve status, even when this implies rules that most be followed and standards that must be met. Simultaneously, though, they expect their associations to make it easy for members to understand the rules and meet the standards.

          In essence, association professional development programs are expected to fulfill contradictory objectives. On the one hand they must attempt to offer ready access to information at low cost and thereby allow members to meet credentialing needs with minimal effort. On the other hand they are expected to challenge members with complex information and critical analysis in order to advance the field and promote transformation. Because no one approach can accomplish these contradictory objectives, most associations diversify. The following section offers a quick sketch of the broad range of educational offerings, with particular attention to technology and distance learning.


          Association Continuing Education Programs

          Professional associations design and deliver educational offerings for members in a broad array of formats. Some associations, particularly those with limited membership and modest budgets, specialize in one or two types of programs. Others offer a broad range of educational opportunities. Table 1 summarizes the most common types of professional development, while Table 2 describes a range of distance education offerings.

          Looking first at Table 1, association sponsored professional development opportunities can be divided into three broad categories: conferences and meetings, workshops and short courses, and distance education. The information presented in the table largely speaks for itself and will not be repeated in the text. The education associated with conferences and meetings largely consists of information transfer from a speaker or panel to those in the audience. In almost all of these cases the speaker is a member of the profession reporting either on original research or on innovative applications. In those professions where tracking of participation in continuing education is required and/or valued, credits are assigned for conferences or speakers based on contact hours.


          To go to Table 1, click on the link below:
          Table 1


          Workshops and short courses usually involve a more in-depth look at a specific topic with some degree of participation by those in attendance. It is not unusual for participants to be asked to do some reading in advance, or to complete exercises or projects as part of the experience. As indicated in Table 1, the role of associations in delivery of workshops or short courses may vary from design and teaching by association staff to co-sponsorship with manufacturers or universities. In those professions with formal continuing education requirements, there also may be multiple vendors offering programs for a fee. Whether or not there are continuing education requirements, employers with sufficient members of the profession on staff may offer training in conjunction with associations to help employees keep abreast of recent developments in the field. In most professions workshops and short courses offer participants the option to accumulate continuing education credits.

          Distance education may be available directly from a professional association or from others that coordinate (co-sponsor) offerings with the association. Table 2 summarizes the most common versions. The most widespread approach to distance education is self study. Traditional correspondence courses are still available in many professions, as are other print variations. Some associations select specific articles in each journal issue as self study options, with continuing education credits awarded to those who submit a self administered exam (assuming that they pass). Some associations contract with academics or practitioners to produce audio or video courses that individuals can purchase and complete on their own. More recently a few associations have offered their courses on CDRom.


          To go to Table 2, click on the link below:
          Table 2


          The most rapidly expanding form of association continuing education is distance education for group study. One version is the on-line course that can be purchased by an individual and completed at his/her own pace. This option is included under group study because the internet allows the sponsoring organization to set up chat rooms for whoever is currently enrolled in the course, and to offer quick feedback by instructors to questions submitted via e-mail either privately to the instructors or to a list serve of all participants.

          Some internet courses are more structured with limited enrollment and a set schedule. In the structured courses it is usually possible to assign discussion groups, administer regular exams and to offer individual or group feedback as the course progresses. Even more time specific than internet courses are teleconferences and satellite hook-ups. For both of these, the program typically consists of a workshop lasting two hours or more with an instructor in the home base and with multiple remote locations tuned in. In both formats specific times are set aside for questions from the field. In the teleconference version, some associations now supplement the instructor's verbal presentation with power point displays via the internet, and offer discussion options via fax and e-mail.

          A brief overview of the professional development programs of selected associations reflects the variation in practice. For the AAPA the focus of the educational effort is the association's annual conference. Approximately 20% of the organization's members attend the conference, primarily to take advantage of the broad range of speakers and panels and to earn Continuing Medical Education (CME) units. The AIChE also has a formal educational effort, but here the venue of choice is a two to four day workshop with a hefty price tag ($1,200 for members for a three-day). The workshops feature the top names in the field, are offered in locations across the country, and tuition is usually covered by employers.

          The American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) offers two to three teleconference sessions per month, with simultaneous internet transmission of displays. The price is modest ($150 per site), and there is no limit on the number of participants at a site. The entire session is immediately archived and accessible to fee payers. The Special Libraries Association (SLA) offers similar programs to its members, but views them as useful only for information transfer on recent developments in the profession – convenient, inexpensive and fast. For those interested in a deeper learning experience, SLA offers week long residence opportunities two to three times per year that challenge participants to think differently about their work and the world in which they live.

          Larger associations have the luxury of considering a broader range of offerings than would be possible for AAPA, AIChE, ASLA or SLA. For example, ASHA sponsors a major annual conference, specialty conferences, and a broad range of distance learning programs. The annual conference attracts over 10,000 participants and features 1,400 sessions in a variety of specialized tracks, along with 24 half day short courses and computer labs. An annual specialty conference on school-based practice is smaller by design with 200 practitioners involved in a series of coordinated workshops. ASHA also offers 15 teleconferences per year, produces nine videos with supplemental materials, has numerous audio tapes on sale, plus self study assignments for selected journal articles, and a limited enrollment five week interactive internet course with weekly content modules.

          The AICPA, one of the largest associations with 340,000 members, offers an even more extensive menu of educational options. It's on-line Infobytes catalog features about 1,000 hours of Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credit, and is available to members at a fixed annual fee of $95. The association also has a cadre of 200 adjunct instructors, and offers 3,000 days of live training each year, with most sessions co-sponsored either by a state association, an accounting firm or a major corporation. In addition, the AICPA co-sponsors 40 or 50 conferences each year, and offers an annual week long national banking school at the University of Virginia. Add self study courses on cassette, video and CDRom and essentially the AICPA is a full service educational provider.

          By contrast another very large association, the IEEE, offers largely decentralized professional development opportunities. Programs offered directly by IEEE are mostly self-study distance learning on video and CDRom. But its reach goes well beyond these materials. Increasingly IEEE distance education efforts will utilize the web as the primary delivery system. Its web site (the IEEE Professional Development Institute) serves a clearinghouse function and is packed with information on continuing education opportunities for electrical engineers. For example, the 40 societies and technical sections affiliated with IEEE sponsor conferences that can be accessed at IEEE/PDI. The association is also beginning to partner with universities, corporations and other education providers to offer members access to web-based courses.

          Although licensing and certification requirements help determine the extent of professional development programming an association will pursue, a myriad of other factors are at play as well, such as the organization's history, the size of typical employers, the culture of the profession, and the role of universities in the field. The size of the association is also extraordinarily important simply because of the effect on resources. Most associations choose an educational niche that fits the members' professional needs and attempt to excel in that niche. Probably the most important influence overall is popularity with members.

          Based on qualitative judgments offered by association education directors, there are some patterns in this regard. Whether or not there are licensing requirements related to continuing education, members appreciate easy access, which helps explain the attraction of conferences and distance education; also popular are learning activities offered at the workplace whether live or via distance education. Content oriented programs on hot topics in the field are highly valued, especially if a nationally recognized expert is involved. And proven presenters attract a following, as do educational vendors with a good track record.

          High quality is a consistent objective in all professional development offerings because members demand it, but accessibility is equally important. And quality tends to be defined based at least partially on entertainment value and fit with the hot topic of the moment, with some resistance to deeper learning experiences that challenge ingrained practice. There is a particular challenge in offering quality learning opportunities via distance education. As Jeff De Cagna of SLA observes, "we tend to take everything that is worst about in-person and put it on the web or a CDRom." More interactive distance learning options seem to be better educationally, but probably the most realistic approach is to recognize the limitations inherent in most distance formats and to use the medium to offer broad access without pretending to fulfill a need for in-depth or transformational learning.


          The Delivery of Professional Development by Associations

          In addition to the variation in format described in the preceding section, there is also a range of practice in respect to the role the association plays in delivering educational programs. Table 3 presents alternative delivery systems. The first option, for the association to employ instructors who design and deliver training, is actually not very common. An example is the Mortgage Bankers Association of America (MBAA) whose 100 or so correspondence and web-based courses are almost all authored and coordinated by staff.

          More common is for the association to employ professional staff who administer the programs and recruit instructors. Most associations call upon volunteers from among their members to make presentations to their peers. This is in fact the most common approach to continuing education at association conferences and chapter meetings. Quality control is particularly difficult when the presenters are members, especially if they volunteer for conference duty. As one education director decried, "They get up there with their power point and drone away."




          Table 3
          Professional Development Delivery Systems

          I. Association administers program and employs instructors

          II. Association administers program and recruits instructors

            A. Volunteers
            B. Paid adjuncts
            C. Vendors

          III. Association co-sponsors or endorses programs delivered by other organizations
            A. Affiliates
            B. Employers
            C. Manufacturers
            D. Universities
            E. Vendors



          In some cases the association staff will address this potential problem by designing training materials then recruiting a network of volunteers to deliver workshops. An example is the American Forest Foundation's environmental education program Project Learning Tree. In operation for a quarter of a century, Project Learning Tree has an elaborate system of volunteers in every state and reaches approximately 30,000 teachers each year through a train the trainer program. The teachers in turn deliver the organization's educational modules to public school students throughout the country.

          Most associations also make some use of paid adjuncts, and for some organizations this is the primary arrangement.

          The AIChE is an example as described by Nina Weber: "Our trainers are leaders in their field, usually published senior professors… We pay them as well as possible

          with bonuses for successful programs." Even associations that rely primarily on volunteers often make special arrangements to pay honoraria to established stars in the profession, especially if they are effective speakers with a broad following.

          Instruction and related services may also be purchased from vendors, especially when the topic crosses professions; it is common to hire vendors for programs on topics such as strategic planning or team building. The SLA, for example, partnered with like minded people to design and deliver a symposium on "Creating Indispensable Partnerships" in January 2001.

          Associations can greatly extend their educational reach by co-sponsoring or endorsing programs that are delivered by other organizations. Associations often are formally affiliated with related societies engaged in educational programming, and almost all have state and local chapters that offer small conferences or substantive presentations at periodic meetings. The national association may co-sponsor events with these affiliates, offer pro-forma endorsements, or even license educational offerings and grant continuing education credits. The IEEE co-sponsors conferences with its 36 affiliated professional societies and four technical councils. All of ASHA's state chapters are licensed by the national association to deliver programs for continuing education credit.

          Associations also partner with other organizations. The AIA co-sponsors professional development with architectural firms, even when enrollment is limited to the firm's own employees. The American Pharmaceutical Association (APhA) partners with pharmaceutical manufacturers to produce New Product Bulletins for its pharmacist members. In 2001 ASLA is co-sponsoring an online certificate program on the Digital Office with Pennsylvania State University. And in 2000 the AICPA co-sponsored events with Alamo Learning Systems, the Conference Board, Executive Enterprises, Inc., and the Information Systems Audit and Control Association. The advantage of all of these partnerships is that the association can secure a broader range of educational opportunities for its members with modest use of its own limited resources. The challenge is to accomplish this while maintaining some influence over content and while confirming that the quality of the educational experience is likely to meet the professional needs of members.

          Of the associations studied in this project, three stand out for the broad reach of their professional development function. The AIA has adopted a coordinating role built around a system to register providers of educational programs for architects, who then can use the AIA signature in advertising their programs. There are over 2,200 providers registered by AIA, including about 900 manufacturers, over 450 architectural firms, about 300 state and local chapters, and a smaller collection of universities and non-profits. With the help of a national network of volunteer members, the AIA monitors (via spot checks) the approximately 25,000 programs offered by registered providers each year. This is accomplished with three professional staff in the association's national offices, supplemented by a team of ten at the University of Oklahoma with whom the AIA contracts to keep records of those attending the training and earning continuing education credits (there were over one million entries in 2000). The AIA limits its own direct offerings to two target audiences: (1) providers to whom the association offers programs on the administration, promotion and delivery of continuing education, and (2) architectural firms for whom the association organizes retreats on leadership and strategic planning.

          ASHA engages in an effort similar to AIA licensing 400 providers including manufacturers of relevant products, employers (especially hospitals and clinics), state associations, and universities. Unlike AIA, the registrar's function is performed in house by ASHA staff. In addition to licensing providers, ASHA reaches many of its members directly using a variety of distance education techniques as described in the previous section. What was not explained above was the procedure followed in designing the elements of the distance learning programs. ASHA relies heavily on volunteer advisory committees organized by area of expertise. These committees help select topics for audio, video and web-based courses, they recommend potential instructors, and they conduct peer review of materials to check for content accuracy and coverage. Their work is supplemented by a team of a dozen content coordinators who serve as ASHA staff; these professionals are experienced in audiology or speech-language pathology and serve as liaisons between the ASHA education department and the instructors. Among other things they help recruit the instructors and work with them in planning the courses, selecting assigned readings, and preparing for their performance in the studio or for their Internet experience. Because of this system of professional input and support, ASHA has developed an excellent reputation among its members for the quality of the programs offered directly by the national association.

          The AICPA operates in a decentralized environment. Because of the heavy involvement of state governments in establishing specific licensing standards for CPA's, the state associations are expected by their members to play a major role in organizing training opportunities targeted to the state's continuing education requirements. The national AICPA offers a menu of educational programs to state associations and to employers directly, but plays no role in coordinating or licensing the educational offerings of other providers. Most state associations have their own education directors and develop in-house programs that in effect compete with those of the national AICPA. There are also a number of other providers in the market including universities and numerous independent vendors. Because the state associations are independent from the national association, they can contract with anyone for educational offerings to their members.

          Dissatisfied with its own programming, in 1999 the AICPA annexed one of the largest and most popular providers of accounting education, the Professional Development Institute (PDI) which was originally established by North Texas State University in the 1970's. PDI brought with it a carefully constructed approach to continuing education that relies on a network of 200 adjunct faculty. New instructors are recruited as the need arises and go through a careful interview and reference check process, with strong preference for some experience teaching practitioners (as AICPA Director of Continuing Professional Education Group Study Pam Wilhoite observes, "University teaching doesn't prepare you."). All new instructors are offered a training program at AICPA expense; there is a strong emphasis on interactive pedagogy. Course design, class materials and discussion leader guides are produced centrally by AICPA, although instructors are expected to read the audience and satisfy the participants in each class. Typical enrollment is 15-40. PDI introduced a pay for performance system for instructors many years ago based on end of class evaluations. Those whose evaluation average exceeds 4.3 on a scale of 5 receive a bonus above the standard rate of $700 per day, while those whose average falls below 4.0 suffer a reduction in pay. Long term instructors are paid based on average evaluations over time rather than facing class by class variation. The attitude of AICPA is that professionals want to learn and want their needs met, so instructors who succeed in this regard should be rewarded.

          This system of central control, careful course design, instructor recruitment and pay for performance has been highly successful. Competing in an open market with numerous competitors, the AICPA provides 35-40% of live CPA training nationally. The state associations combined deliver a comparable share directly and other providers divide what is left. The association makes no effort to monitor or influence the quality of other educational providers, but attends meticulously to the quality of its own programs.


          Quality Control: The Approval and Certification of Educational Providers

          Associations are committed to serving members' desire for access to high quality educational opportunities. When offering training directly to members the associations are at least in a position to exert influence over content, format and instruction. In those cases where the association licenses others to provide the training, quality control is a more difficult objective to achieve. The previous section briefly described the role played by AIA and ASHA, associations that extend their reach by granting credit for programs offered by an extensive network of licensed providers. The licensing process itself incorporates a set of requirements that at least indirectly influence quality.

          Associations that license providers almost always offer some form of continuing education credits as part of the agreement. The processes used are strikingly similar from one association to another, in large part because they usually follow guidelines established by the International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET). Where distance learning is involved the standards of the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC) produce comparable consistency.

          ASHA's system is typical. Aspiring providers must submit a detailed application, and must meet eleven requirements to attain and maintain approved provider status. The requirements are summarized briefly in Table 4. They are spelled out in detail along with information on required paperwork in a providers' manual that is almost 300 pages long. Approval of providers is based on a review of the application material submitted. So long as all reporting requirements are met and all forms are completed accurately and filed in a timely manner, approved status is retained, ASHA credits are awarded, and the provider is licensed to use the ASHA logo on all class and promotional materials. Providers are reviewed every four years and "evaluated against on-going ability to meet standards." ASHA does not review or approve course content or instructors. In essence ASHA standards and those of other associations assure that providers do a good job of tracking and reporting credits awarded, an objective that is certainly very important




          Table 4
          Requirements for ASHA CE Provider Approval

          1. Organization – must have continuing education administrative department.

          2. Responsibility and control – must follow ASHA procedures.

          3. System for offering and verifying Continuing Education Units – must have procedure to identify participants and maintain records.

          4. Needs identification – must assess needs of target audience.

          5. Learning outcomes – must identify intended learning outcomes.

          6. Instructional personnel – must insure that instructors are qualified.

          7. Facilities and learning support – must ensure appropriate facilities and materials.

          8. Content and methodology – must provide materials and use methodologies consistent with intended learning outcomes.

          9. Requirements for satisfactory completion – must adopt appropriate requirements and inform participants.

          10. Assessment of learning outcome – must plan learning assessment in advance.

          11. Program evaluation – must plan evaluation in advance.



          to association members who are using the credits to meet certification requirements. The standards also encourage providers to be systematic in planning and delivering programs, although since there is no on site monitoring the actual requirement only assures that a system is minimally in place. The ultimate check on provider quality, then, comes not from ASHA but from members who reward success by enrolling in future courses and punish failure by withholding enrollment.

          The AIA has made some attempt to address the potential weaknesses in the provider system. As noted earlier, AIA offers an annual conference for providers in an effort to promote effective administration and appropriate pedagogy. In this regard, AIA experimented with a system of differential credit under the rubric "learning unit credit" based on three "quality levels," with one unit awarded for each hour of "passive" learning (lecture, slide presentation, viewing a video, etc.), two units awarded for each hour of "interactive" learning (discussions, group exercises, interactive computer software, etc.), and three units awarded for each hour of learning with "feedback" (required task, demonstration of skill, test, etc.). Unfortunately, difficulty monitoring the differential credit and member complaints forced AIA to return to a standard one credit per hour in 2000. The concept of differential quality of learning is still endorsed in the association's providers manual and at the annual conference for providers, but there is no effort to enforce standards related to style of presentation.

          The AIA also monitors course evaluations and unsolicited complaints, and has developed a network of volunteers who follow up on problems and conduct spot checks. A particular area of concern is the potential for conflict of interest, especially when manufacturers use a training venue to promote their products. The monitoring system probably helps to minimize serious problems and blatant abuse, but with 25,000 programs a year offered by registered providers, AIA can only check on a very small percent of them.

          In an effort to proactively encourage high quality, the AIA has established an annual Award for Excellence for registered providers. Six judging categories are in place, with no more than one award per category. In 2000, for example, three awards were presented. Award winners are announced prominently in AIA publications, and presumably the providers who are selected can use the honor to promote their programs.

          It is important to point out that associations benefit financially from licensing providers. The AIA, for example funds its $1 million per year professional development effort almost entirely from licensing fees. Providers who offer education nationally or internationally either in person or via distance learning are charged $2,700 annually. Lower fees are charged for conferences and other discrete events ($300 - $750 depending on attendance), universities ($500 annually) and architectural firms ($150 annually).

          An interesting adaptation of the provider licensing model has been implemented by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), a subsidiary of the American Nurses Association (ANA). The primary function of the ANCC is to certify individual nurses in over 40 specialty areas. Certification is awarded to nurses who meet minimum experience requirements for the specialty and who successfully pass a certification exam in their specialty administered nationally for ANCC by a branch of the Educational Testing Service. The exam is designed by a committee of nurses certified in the specialty in consultation with a psychometrician. Over 150,000 nurses nationally hold an ANCC specialty certification, making this the largest credentialing organization of any profession. The ANCC is itself accredited by the National Commission for Certifying Organizations, the credentialing arm of the National Organization for Credentialing Assurance (NOCA).

          In addition to this credentialing role, the ANCC also accredits providers of continuing education for nurses as a vehicle to enhance educational quality; many of these providers are involved either in helping nurses prepare for certification, or in delivering courses that allow nurses to meet requirements for recertification. The ANCC accreditation process is comparable to those followed by ASHA and AIA with one important extra provision – a site visit to the provider's central offices is required before approval or renewal is granted. The fee for five year accreditation is at least $4,500 and can be as much as $7,000 depending on the organizational status of the provider and the extent of programming offered.


          Evaluation, Erudition and Transformation

          The last section addressed efforts by associations to control the quality of the educational programs delivered by licensed providers. Realistically, once an organization has decided to cede to others decisions regarding content and instruction, the most it can do is establish systematic procedures and attempt to verify that these procedures at least create a floor for minimum quality standards. But by their nature programs to accredit and license providers cannot set a quality bar that is very high.

          As reported in various contexts above, associations sometimes take steps in advance to enhance the quality of the programs they sponsor. Thus ASHA relies on peer review of plans for audio and video productions before materials are prepared for distribution. The AIA experiment with differential credit attempted to reward pedagogical styles and class formats that offered better learning opportunities. And the AICPA's system of centralized course development and instructor screening and preparation addresses both content and pedagogy. These laudable efforts clearly go beyond what is possible with simple licensing systems or standard conference presentations by volunteers; with consistent content and effective teaching style associations can comfortably predict that information will be communicated reliably. However, if the goal of professional development is to advance knowledge and promote deeper learning, then quality control alone is insufficient.

          In fact, most association professional development efforts aim no higher than effective communication and basic customer satisfaction. Association education staff use a variety of criteria to judge success. The most common questions they ask themselves are presented in Table 5. Although profitability is a higher priority in some associations than in others, there is general consensus that financial performance is important to assure viability of educational programs. Assuming adequate revenue, the next criterion is attendance – if attendance meets or exceeds expectations, there is an assumption that at least the topic and scheduling were appropriate.

          However, these first two questions measure success with no attention at all to the educational experience. The next four implicitly address progressively deeper learning achievements. Association education directors want to do more than entertain. They are committed to offering useful information, and many hope to change practice. A few even strive to create an environment that challenges participants to think differently, in a way that might ultimately contribute to organizational change and elevation of the profession.

          Associations attempt to measure effectiveness at meeting educational objectives through systematic evaluation. The last four questions in Table 5 mirror progressively higher levels of evaluation as identified in The Association Educator's Toolkit. This guide published by the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) in 1995 includes a chapter on evaluating programs where four basic categories of evaluation are identified: level 1 participant reaction, level 2 knowledge gain, level 3 behavioral change, and level 4 organizational consequences. Although there is general acceptance of the desirability of comprehensive evaluation that encompasses all of these levels, the reality is that the evaluation systems in place seldom go beyond efforts to measure participant reaction.

          If the event was profitable, attendance was good, and participants left happy, then there is an implicit assumption that to some extent higher educational objectives must have been achieved. In fact, many associations use their annual conference as a gauge to guide decisions regarding design of new workshops and distance education materials. The sessions with the best attendance and the highest on the spot evaluations often serve as the basis for the next round of




          Table 5
          Educational Success

          1. Was the event profitable?

          2. Was attendance "good'?

          3. Did participants enjoy the event?

          4. Was information effectively communicated?

          5. Was behavior changed?

          6. Was the event transformational?




          audiotapes, videos, CDRoms, on-line courses and regular workshop offerings. Given that professional associations are driven by a need to respond to members' priorities, this market driven approach is eminently reasonable. It is often rationalized by the argument that members are, after all, professional and the real experts and would not be satisfied unless they were being challenged by new ideas and fresh information.

          As Jeff De Cagna of SLA observes, "Evaluation is based on BITS – butts in the seats… Associations ask, 'Do we have sufficient offerings to meet member licensing and certification needs?" He goes on to note that evaluations are used to "weed out poor performing offerings and instructors," but that is pretty much the extent of the effort. Karen Niles of ASHA basically confirms this, "We try to evaluate, but it's really just an end of the course reaction. We have no clue about changed behavior."

          Perhaps the most systematic higher level evaluation is used for some forms of distance education. Whereas credits are assigned automatically for attendance at conference sessions and chapter meetings (and even for time spent in exhibit halls), credit for distance self study courses is reserved for those who successfully complete an exam on the material. While questions might be raised about the legitimacy of a self administered exam on material that can be accessed when selecting answers, at least there is some check of the individual's familiarity with the information presented. This in essence accomplishes the second level of evaluation identified by ASAE, knowledge gain.

          Some associations have experimented with evaluation systems for live events that go beyond standard participant reaction (often referred to in discussions as "smile sheets"). The AIA has contracted with Clemson University to design and test new a evaluation instrument to at least reach beyond enjoyment and get at content. The SLA uses open ended questions to get qualitative input; e.g., how will this help you in your work?, how can we improve the learning experience? The ANA selected four of the sessions at its 2000 annual conference and conducted a pre-test, a reaction form and a follow up six months later in an effort to measure (at least for these selected presentations) information transfer, retention and application. Nina Weber of AIChE reports that while she was in her former position on the education staff of the American Management Association it was standard practice for a time to send out evaluations three months after each training. However, the response rate was relatively low, and a cost-benefit decision was reached to end the practice. With the exception of isolated experiments like these, the uniform approach remains immediate short form style evaluations at the conclusion of each event. Associations have not been able to move systematically to higher levels of evaluation that measure change in behavior or organizational impact.

          Is there any potential that professional development can go beyond broad exposure to information and deliver a deeper learning experience? Given the day to day demands of their own jobs and their limited exposure to relevant events beyond the immediate setting, it is difficult for professionals either to find the time or even to recognize the need for anything more than occasional networking opportunities and access to selected sources of current information. As ASHA's Niles points out about members, "It's hard to get them to look out ahead rather than at their interest of the moment."

          There are a few best practice type cases that indicate that erudition is indeed possible. The SLA sponsors two or three residence learning events each year that strive to create an environment where participants are free to examine how they think, with a goal of deep and enduring change. An event co-sponsored with Simmons College in Boston, and drawing on faculty from prominent schools of library science in an area, is a case in point. The focus of "MLS [Master of Library Science] Renewal for Special Librarians" was on redefining the role of special librarians within their organizations. Table 6 displays questions that participants addressed during their week at Simmons. By its nature, though, this event and others like it can only reach a tiny fraction of association members, and are in fact likely to appeal to the select few already open to a broader world view. For those who do attend there is the additional question of whether one individual who has been "transformed" can go back into their employing organization and lead change. Since many special librarians work in settings with a relatively small staff of professionals and often serve in leadership positions, the opportunity is present for them to transform practice at least in their own libraries (if not more broadly in the organization that houses and funds them). De Cagna admits that "we are not able to get at whether there is a change [in practice]… You have to change their way of thinking first then let them change how they act."

          An alternate approach is for the association itself to engage in strategic planning on behalf of the profession, set priorities, and attempt to influence practice via all of its activities including professional development. In 1998 the AICPA initiated an on-going Vision Project to look at where the profession is headed. The entire effort was initiated in the face of potentially declining demand for the services of CPA's due to the spread of computers and growing sophistication and availability of tax preparation and financial services software. Based on the visioning effort, AICPA is developing strategies to change the way accountants work and alter the services they provide in order to offer greater economic value to clients. Consistent with this initiative, the AICPA education unit has developed new workshops and on-line courses, for example, in elder care services to respond to the aging population and potentially tap a new growth market. Unfortunately Pam Wilhoite notes, "We have to drag people to the course."




          Table 6
          MLS Renewal for Special Librarians

          • How can information professionals develop leadership positions within organizations?

          • What are the emerging technologies most likely to shape the future?

          • What distinctive contributions can information professionals make to advance the key strategic goals of their organizations?

          • How can information professionals operate as catalysts for meaningful and positive organizational change?




          A similar approach is being followed by AIA, but in this case the association is not conducting the environmental scan itself and using it to identify strategic priorities. Rather, the association holds two strategic planning retreats for a total of forty large and mid-sized firms each year. The firms leave with their own business goals, strategic priorities and action plans. The idea is to have the most important employers of architects take the lead on needs driven strategic planning for the profession. Because this program is for decision makers, and because there are only a little over 100 large and 200 mid-sized architectural firms active in the association (including the most influential in the industry), the AIA approach has great potential to promote transformation broadly.

          (For a list of Associations mentioned in this paper, go to: Professional Associations)


          Dr. Richard Hurd is Professor and Director of Labor Studies at Cornell University. A leading specialist on trade union administration and strategy, he has been quoted widely in the national print and broadcast media on various labor issues. He also has offered testimony before Congressional Committees and Presidential Commissions. Hurd is co-editor of Organizing to Win (Cornell University ILR Press, 1998) and Restoring the Promise of American Labor Law (ILR Press, 1994). He has published dozens of papers in books and professional journals, among them "Professional Employees and Union Democracy," "Is Organizing Enough? Race, Gender and Union Culture," "Contesting the Dinosaur Image: the Labor Movement's Search for a Future," and "Beyond the Organizing Model." Professor Hurd works closely with labor organizations developing training programs and offering technical assistance on strategic issues including trade union management, organizational change, internal and external organizing, strategic planning, and leadership development. His clients include AFL-CIO Office of the President, AFL-CIO Department for Professional Employees, AFT Shanker Institute, New York State United Teachers, AFSCME-CSEA, UNITE, and the American Guild of Musical Artists. An economist by training, Professor Hurd has served as an Economic Policy Fellow at the Brookings Institution. He earned his Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University.

          Do not quote or distribute without permission of the author
          607-255-2765, rwh8@cornell.edu

          This project could not have been completed without the endorsement of the Professional Development Council of the American Society of Association Executives. Council chair Mickie Rops and her colleagues were extraordinarily helpful and their assistance was invaluable.

          back to homepage